Political Networks of Companies - New Tasking

Consolidated data
Self-rank Correlations
Rest of Work
by 2003 Revenue
By SIC
FPA Submission
Old Data

Other Presentation Approach - Conslidated and "High Performers" ToP

New Histograms instead of pies

These are the alternate presentation approaches requested by the sponsor. The ones on available from the link on the left is the consolidated data; those on the right are the High Performers. The old ones (House of Pies) are available HERE.

New Histograms instead of pies

Consolidated data (NEW)

These are the LATEST SAS graphs (gif's) for all data. They are slightly different from the "NEW" data of March 2005, and slightly more different than the "old" data prior to that. (see FPA submission)

Summary Statistics for Explanatory and Congressional Activities . This version deletes the range in favor of MINIMUM and MAXIMUM. These are the consolidated data for all companies in tabular format. They have been grouped by SIC and Sales (see above menu).

Summary Statistics for Explanatory and Congressional Activities, Comparison with All and the "High-Performers." . Summary statistics for the High performers, grouped by SIC and Sales.

Summary Statistics, using RANGE. These are the consolidated data for all companies in tabular format. They have not been grouped yet by SIC or Sales, and are considered SUPERCEEDED.

Correlations of Consolidated data - All Responses ToP

Numerical correlations of Senate and House activities with various predictor groups such as outcomes, tactics, and cooperation. These include what was previously refered to as "intimacy" measure. Due to different combinations of missing data when analyzing blocks of variables, the correlations will vary between tables.

Correlations of Consolidated data for "High Performers" ToP

The High-performers were determined to be those firms providing a mean response greater than 2.0 for questions
    Q87 better results than competitors
    Q88 able to obtain firm specific benefits
    Q92 % of goals achieved
This sample set was of size 14. We compare this group with all respondents, also broken down as above. Due to different combinations of missing data when analyzing blocks of variables, the correlations will vary between tables.

Summary Statistics by 2003 Revenue ToP

These are the summary statistics in lieu of 3-D bar or pie charts broken down by 2003 REVENUE. Recall our breakdown:

Less than $5B revenue in 2003;
Between 5 and 10 $B revenue in 2003; and
More than $10B revenue in 2003.

This version deletes the standard deviation and the range. The range can be inferred from the MINIMUM and MAXIMUM, and the standard deviation can be inferred from the confridence interval.
..

Summary Statistics by SIC (major group) ToP

These are the summary statistics in lieu of 3-D bar or pie charts broken down by MAJOR SIC GROUPING. Recall our breakdown:

Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, and Mining 01-14
Manufacturing 20-39
Transportation, Communications, Electric, Gas, And Sanitary Services 40-49
Wholesale and Retail Trade 50-59
Finance, Insurance and Real Estate 60-67
Engineering, Construction, Legal, Health and Other Services 15-17, 70-89
Public Administration 91-99

This version deletes the standard deviation and the range. The range can be inferred from the MINIMUM and MAXIMUM, and the standard deviation can be inferred from the confridence interval.
..

Data and Graphics as submitted to FPA    ToP

If additional information is needed, please contact me at dobelman@stat.rice.edu