(a)
Solution:
In words, is the event the firm is awarded
project 1 or project 2. (Note that a set union is
always associated with on ``or''. More explicitly, it
is a so called inclusive or, meaning one or the other or
both.)
Applying the Proposition on p. 62:
(b)
[Hint:
]
Solution:
is the event the firm is not
awarded project 1 and not awarded project 2. (A
set intersection always goes with ``and.'') Note that the
hint is true since the event of not winning at least one
of projects 1 or 2 is the same as the event of losing both.
Applying the result of part (a) and the first proposition
on p. 61,
(c)
Solution:
is the event of wining at least one
of the three projects. Applying the formula in the box on
p. 63,
(d)
Solution: This is the event that the firm doesn't win any of the projects. It is the complement of hte event in part (c), so
(e)
Solution: This is the even of not winning 1 and not winning 2 and winning 3, i.e. of winning only 3. This one is rather tricky, and there don't seem to be any results in the book one can use to get it directly. A Venn diagram depicting the event as the colored region is shown below.
I claim
(f)
Solution: This is the event of losing both projects 1 and 2, or winning project 3. The Venn diagram is shown below.
From the Venn diagram, it is clear that our event is the
union of the disjoint events
and A3. We have
already compupted the pobability of
and A3 in part
(d). Thus, by the third axiom of probability,