Journal Club Spring 2001
Journal club meets on Fridays from 1:30 to 2:30 in Duncan Hall 1044 unless otherwise noted.
Parking is available in visitor spots in Lot C (Abercrombie lot),
Entrance 16 from Rice Blvd.
- 21 February
Alex Renwick
Time Change to Wed. 3pm
Room Change to DH 3092
"Inferring Time to Most Recent Common Ancestor from Sequence Data: The
Effect of Mutation Rate Variation
"
Abstract:
Coalescent theory provides a probability distribution for the time to the
most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of a set of chromosomes sampled
randomly from a population. Conditional on this time, one can arrive at a
distribution for the number of mutational differences between the sampled
chromosomes. In this paper, the authors reverse the conditioning to
arrive at the distribution of the time to MRCA conditional on the number
of mutational differences observed. Further, they show that this
distribution is sensitive to between-site variation in mutation rates.
The authors present an MCMC method to arrive at the desired distibutions.
Paper Title:
The Effects of Rate Variation on Ancestral Inference in the Coalescent
Authors:
Lada Markovtsova, Paul Marjoram, and Simon Tavare
Source:
Genetics 2000 156: 1427-1436.
- 4 April
Elise Eller
Time Change to Wed. 1:30pm
CANCELLED
- 4 May
Mike Swartz
1:30pm. DH 1044
Title: Linkage Detection Adaptive to Linkage Disequilibrium: The
Disequilibrium Maximum-Likelihood-Binomial Test for Affected-Sibship =
Data
Abstract:
Huang and Jiang discuss a method that is adaptive to how much is known =
about linkage disequilibrium in the population considered.
They based their method on the Maximum Likelihood Binomial test, and
simply added a parameter that considers linkage disequilibrium
information. This form of the MLB, which they call the Disequilibrium =20
Maximum Likelihood Binomial, adaptively considers the identity by
decent(IBD) sharing score, which is family based, and the contrast =
between
allele specific IBD sharing score, which is informative only when =
linkage =20
disequilibrium is present.
The authors compare the performance of their DMLB test to the mean test
and the Transmission/Disequilibrium Test with theoretical power =
calculations. They found that in most cases of strong and weak linkage =
disequilibrium, the DMLB test is more powerful than that of either the =
TDT, or the mean test. ONly in the absence of linkage is the Mean test =
slightly more powerful than the DMLB.
Authors: Jian Huang and Yanming Jiang
Return to home page