next up previous index
Next: asa.qp.03 Up: ASA Quality and Productivity Previous: asa.qp.01

asa.qp.02


Sponsoring Section/Society: ASA Quality and Productivity

Session Slot: 10:30-12:20 Wednesday

Estimated Audience Size: xx-xxx

AudioVisual Request: xxx


Session Title: Planned & Inadvertent Split-Plotting in Industrial Experiments

Theme Session: No

Applied Session: Yes


Session Organizer: Lucas, James M. J M Lucas & Associates


Address: 5120 New Kent Rd. Wilmington, DE 19808

Phone: 302-368-1214

Fax: 302-456-4013


Session Timing: 110 minutes total (Sorry about format):

Opening Remarks by Chair - 0 minutes First Speaker - 30 minutes Second Speaker - 30 minutes Third Speaker - 30 minutes Discussant - 10 minutes Floor Discussion - 10 minutes


Session Chair: Saccucci, Michael S. Domain Manufacturing Corporation


Address: 3502 Keswick Way Westchester, PA 19382

Phone:

Fax:


1. Split-Plot Response Surface Designs

Lucas, James M.,   J M Lucas & Associates


Address: 5120 New Kent Rd. Wilmington, DE 19808

Phone: 302-368-1214

Fax: 302-456-4013

Hazel, Malcolm C., Campbell Soup Co.

Abstract: We run a Response Surface Experiment in two different ways; as a (completely) randomized experiment and as a split-plot experiment. Our experiment was motivated by the need to emphasize the difference between a randomized run order and a randomized experiment. The error structure and significance of many of the minor variables changes markedly. The effects of the most significant variables and the overall results of the experiment are similar for both ways of running the Response Surface Experiment because of the dominant effect of a few variables. Analysis procedures are shown which extract all the information from the data. We show how standard regression programs can be used, not only to get the correct tests for Split-Plot Experiments, but also to get good confidence and prediction intervals.


2. Randomizing Run Order Without Resetting Factors

Webb, Derek,   Montana St. University


Address: Montana St. University Department of Mathematical Sciences Bozeman, MT 59715

Phone: 406-994-5361

Fax:

Email: webb@math.montana.edu

Lucas, James M., J M Lucas & Associates

Borkowski, John J., Montana St. University

Abstract: Many experiments are run using a random run order, yet if successive runs have the same level of a factor, that factor is not reset. Therefore (complete) randomization is not achieved, and the errors will not be independent. We develop the expected covariance matrix, and calculate the expected bias for significance tests in such experiments. Advantages and disadvantages of using a random run order instead of complete randomization are discussed. In many cases it is appropriate to use a random run order instead of (completely) randomizing the experiment. This is because the maximum variance increases (and the G-efficiency drops) more slowly than the cost drops. This gives justification for the procedure that is so often used in practice. However, it is very important to recognize and understand the difference between a random run order and complete randomization so that the appropriate experimental procedure is used.

Often the experimental goal is to find improved operating conditions or to model how a process works over the experimental region. In many such experimental situations the signal to noise ratio is known to be large. In such situations a random run order is often appropriate. When the purpose of the experiment is scientific understanding (and hypothesis tests), then (complete) randomization is required. When there is a single factor that is hard-to-change then the appropriate split-plot experiment should be considered to get a super-efficient experiment (Anbari and Lucas 1994).


3. Strategies for Designing Complex Split-Plot Experiments

Bancroft, Diccon,   W.L. Gore & Associates


Address: 297 Blue Ball Road Elkton, MD 21921

Phone: 302-239-0727

Fax:

Email: dbancrof@wlgore.com

Abstract: Split-plot experiments are blocked experiments in which some experimental factors are applied at the block level. Some strategies for finding efficient split-plot experiments are described. These are particularly useful when the block factors are not orthogonal to subplot treatments. Examples given include a class of strip-plot experiments useful for the estimation of variance components, and an unbalanced factorial split-plot.


Discussant: Vining, G. Geoffrey   University of Florida


Address: University of Florida Department of Statistics Gainesville, FL 32611

Phone: 352-392-1941 x204

Fax:

Email: vining@stat.ufl.edu


next up previous index
Next: asa.qp.03 Up: ASA Quality and Productivity Previous: asa.qp.01
David Scott
6/1/1998