Next: Solution to Problem 4.
Up: Solutions to Final Exam
Previous: Solution to Problem 2.
Solution to Problem 3.
(3) [15 points]
Let
and
be statistics, and denote
the unknown parameter by
. Assume
the statistical model has either a pdf or
pmf for the observable. Let
be any
reasonable (i.e., measurable) function.
For each of the following statements, either
give a proof or a counterexample.
(a)
If
is sufficient for
and
for
some function
, then
is sufficient for
.
Solution:
Using the factorization theorem, we know for some
functions
and
so by the factorization theorem,
is sufficient.
The statement is True.
(b)
If
is complete for
and
, then
is complete.
Solution:
Completeness of
means for any function
,
for all
implies
for all
.
If
, then
, so
for all
means
for all
,
which means
for all
, so
is complete. The statement
is True.
(c)
If
is ancillary for
and
, then
is ancillary.
Solution:
Ancillarity means the distribution of
doesn't depend
on
. Of course, if
is a statistic and
is
the data, then
, but the distribution of
does depend on
. Hence, the statement is
False.
Next: Solution to Problem 4.
Up: Solutions to Final Exam
Previous: Solution to Problem 2.
Dennis Cox
2003-01-18